Members Login

Practice Based Commissioning

Questions and Answers

Q  what is practice based commissioning?

 

A Commissioning is the process by which the health needs of the population are assessed, the responsibility is taken for ensuring that appropriate services are available which meet the needs and the accountability for associated healthcare outcomes. Practice based commissioning transfers these responsibilities, along with the associated budget from the PCT to primary care clinicians.

 

Q what are the main principles of practice based commissioning?

A (a) a working partnership between the PCT and practices to improve health care of the local population.
(b) engagement of primary and community care clinicians in commissioning
(c)
creates an environment for innovation
(d) 
supporting a shift from secondary to primary care
(e) empowering clinicians to develop services and care packages that meet the needs of their population
(f)
improved patient care through service redesign
(g) optimise patient choice by providing more services closer to the patient. 

 

Q do practices have to accept a budget and agree to commission? 


A a practice can not be forced to hold a budget or take responsibility for commissioning services for their patients, however practices will be encouraged to consider the advantages of commissioning. The guidance states that all practices will be holding budgets by 2008. 

 

Q can a practices choose when to hold a budget?

 

A a practice or group of practices may opt to take responsibility for commissioning and the related budget at any time, after the 1st April 2005,  with the agreement of the Professional Executive Committee (PEC).

 

Q how will the budget be calculated?

A the baseline budget will be calculated by using 2003 – 04 hospital activity data which is then converted into HRGs and spells then costed at national tariff to give a financial baseline.  All individual practice budgets will then be added together ensuring that they are no greater that the total PCT resources. 

 

 

Q can a budget be set by not using 2003 – 04 HES data

A the DH guidance states that 2003 – 04 HES data should be used to set an indicative budget for 2005 – 06.  PCTs should use this data as the baseline and make adjustments for local variation on activity and cost for 2005 – 2006

 

Q can practices choose to manage part of the allocated budget?

 

A yes - practices can apply their PCT to hold all or part of the commissioning budget.

 

Q what is meant by payment by results?

A the aim of the new financial reforms being introduced across the NHS is to create a transparent system for paying NHS hospitals and other NHS providers.  Payment by Results (PbR) will end the relying on historical budgets and locally negotiated settlements as payments for services will be directly linked to activity and results. PbR will therefore reward efficiency and quality and encourage the better management of demand and risk.  

 

Q will a practice be paid to manage the budget and monitor activity?

 

A the guidance suggests that an adequate level of management support should be available to ensure effective commissioning and that clinical time should be support financially. Management costs will vary according to local circumstances i.e. size of budget devolved, practice involvement .

 

Q what is an indicative budget?

 

A an indicative budget means that legal responsibility for performance against the budget remains with the PCT to which the practice belongs. In simple terms an indicative budget may simply be the amount that was spent historically on referrals to a provider.

 

Q will budgets move to a fair shares model?

A yes - there is a plan nationally to move all budgets to fair shares in 2006. Further guidance is awaited from the DH.

 

Q can practices join together to manage a larger budget?

 

A yes - practices will be encouraged to join together and collectively commission services to improve efficiencies, recognise economies of scale therefore reducing some of the financial risks.

 

Q do practices have to work together?

 

A no - working together across practices or in localities can not be imposed on practices. Practices and PCTs should be working together to agree economies of scale for the development of services.

Q what support can a practice of group of practices expect to get from their PCT?

 

A the PCT is responsibility for and will continue to monitor service level agreements with the acute hospital providers and any other contracts that the PCTs hold. This information will then be attributed to individual practices and groups of practices on either a monthly or quarterly basis. PCT contract teams should support practices in managing their budgets and monitoring contracts

 

Q who will responsible if the budget is overspent?

A the PCT is ultimately responsible for financial balance. The PCT and practice or group of practices will need to develop clear rules about how the budget is spent and how financial risk is managed.

 

Q how can a practice develop new services or transfer services from secondary care?

 

A practices wishing to develop new services for their patients or other patients locally will be asked to submit a business plan. A business plan should clearly state the reasons for the new service, identify all potential risks, expected clinical outcomes and improvement in patient care. The plan should then be submitted to the PEC for approval.

Q is practice based commissioning link to other NHS targets?

 

A PBC is a tool that will enable a number of other national and local targets to be delivered. PCTs should ensure that they communicate with practices what must be delivered and where there is local flexibility.

Q could practice based commissioning be linked to enhanced services?

 

A there is no reason why PCTs should not use the same process for setting up new service in the way that enhanced services have been set up and agreed.   However caution should be taken not to mix PBC activity with current enhanced services agreements

 

Q will the activity data for all practices be shared?

A the PCT and their practices should agreed as part of the local compact how information is shared and with whom.

 

Q how will PBC be monitored?

A further work will need to be carried out to ensure that changes in commissioning can be identified. PCT Information analysists and contract managers will be asked to develop reports showing changes in commissioning trend and efficiency gains. The develop of these reports should as part of the compact be agreed with practices.

 

Q could PBC be monitored in the same way as prescribing?

A GPs and practice managers are used to looking at PPA data and reports. PCTs will be encouraged to develop a similar type of reporting to support commissioning decisions.

 

Q how can a practice sign up to PBC?

A PCTs should be asking their practices for a formal commitment to PBC. This should be based on a local agreement between the PCT and individual practices or groups of practices.

 

Q what is meant by “compact” or “PBC Agreement between PCTs and practices” ?

A so that all parties are clear about their responsibilities for implementing PBC and delivering service redesign there should be a very clear agreement. This agreement could form part of a contractual arrangement with objectives and timescales. The NHS confederation and NAPC have drawn up a guide which may assist PCTs in developing a local agreement. 

 

Q what happens if a practice or group of practices and the PCT can not agree on budgets, setting up of services?

A  the essence of successful PBC will be when PCTs and practices work in partnership to achieve common aims and objectives. However, there is likely to be occasions where PCTs and practices cannot agree or practices and practices connot agree then some form of arbitration process will be required. If PCTs are unable to resolve local differences then the strategic health authority will be called upon to arbitrate.

 

Q what are the direct benefits to patients?

A patients will be offered more choice and practices will be able to construct  “care packages” for patients that reflect the need of each patient. Over time patients will be offered more convenient, more appropriate, closer to home treatment.  Over time PBC will provide the opportunity for GPs to shift emphasis from treatment to improving health and well being of the local population.


 

DESs for 2008/2009

Directed Enhanced Services (DES) are special services or activities provided by GP practices that have been negotiated nationally. All practices can choose whether or not to provide these services.

The following DESs have been agreed for 2008/09:

    * Five new clinical DESs:
          o Heart Failure DES - improving the treatment of heart failure and including incentives to provide beta-blockers to appropriate patients. Practices will get £35 per patient treated under this DES.
          o Alcohol DES - helping to reduce the risk of adults, aged 16 years or over, drinking at 'hazardous and harmful levels' defined by the World Health Organisation. Practices will get £2.33 for each new registered patient that has been screened.
          o Learning Disabilities DES - annual health checks for people on the local authority learning disability register. To participate in this DES, practices need to attend a multi professional education session run by their PCT. Practices will get £100 for every health check.
          o Osteoporosis DES - encouraging practices to diagnose and prescribe appropriate pharmacological secondary prevention for patients with osteoporosis. Payments will be based on three criteria covering diagnoses and treatment. The payment per average practice that meets all three criteria is £588.21
          o Ethnicity DES - rewarding practices for recording the ethnicity and first language of all the patients on their practice list. Practices will get 5.6p per registered patient
    * Extended Opening Hours Access DES - practices are rewarded for providing around 3 hours extra appointment time per average practice a week, at times that suit the needs of their patients. Practices are paid £2.95 per registered patient. The Department of Health (DH) has issued more detailed guidance to PCTs
    * IM&T DES (rolled over from 2007/08) - practice eligibility to receive one-off payments will continue for England for 2008/09. The Department of Health (DH) has amended the Statement of Financial Entitlements (SFE) to allow PCTs to make payments until 31 March 2009

The DH is currently drafting the legal documentation for the five clinical DESs. In the interim, the detailed guidance aims to support PCT discussions with practices on providing these DESs. You can find more details on the inflationary uplift and Access DES on the DH website.
Access DES

The Department of Health has issued guidance to PCTs and strategic health authorities that clarifies the detail of the access DES. In particular:

    * it explains how PCTs with existing local schemes should discuss these with the relevant practice(s)
    * it highlights some key issues that PCTs should consider when commissioning extended hours such as the provision of linked services, safety and security and religious and cultural sensibilities
    * the guidance provides a clear definition of the requirements of the DES, including detail about how the extended opening hours should be calculated and how the hours should be provided
    * it describes how PCTs should monitor performance and delivery of the DES and instructs PCTs how to monitor the progress of the DES using Unify2
    * it explains the payment arrangements for the DES.

http://www.nhsemployers.org/pay-conditions/primary-893.cfm


Information from NHS Employers website.


 

Integrated Care Pilot Programme – update

I would like to extend my thanks to all of you for your continuing interest and enthusiasm in the integrated care pilot programme and to ultimately achieve improved outcomes for patients. I appreciate that it has been some time since our last update, and that many of you are keen to see the final prospectus and to start working on your applications.

We have had a huge amount of interest in the programme, and are therefore anticipating a very high number of bids to become an integrated care pilot. With this in mind, we are taking time to ensure that the application process is consistent, fair and manageable. We have also been working hard over the past month to improve the prospectus and to make the aims and outcomes as clear as possible. We are planning to publish the final prospectus inviting applications to become integrated care pilots in mid-October. The prospectus will be published on the Department of Health’s website, as well as emailed out to everyone on this list.

Due to the number of bids that we anticipate receiving, the selection process will consist of two stages. The first stage will involve a shortlisting exercise on the basis on an initial application form. The second stage will be a more in-depth assessment, and will involve further written evaluation and site visits. We are planning to give potential pilot sites 4-5 weeks to complete the first stage application form. I hope that the early versions you have seen of the prospectus have allowed you to begin thinking about your applications in advance.

If you have any queries about the integrated care programme, please e-mail our dedicated mailbox: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Yours Sincerely


Gary Belfield
Director of Commissioning

 


 

Re-invigorating Practice Based Commissioning

Re-invigorating Practice Based Commissioning

1. Background

1.1 Following the recent DH Accelerated Solutions Environment (ASE) event facilitated by Capgemini, the following issues became clear during the two study days.
In areas where problems remain with the implementation of PBC;

• The service has a variable understanding about why PBC was developed and therefore becomes confused about its main aspirations.
• Commissioning relationships between those particular PCTs and PBC groups remain immature due to misinterpretation of the policy. Clinicians and managers do not comprehend each others language resulting in misunderstandings. This poor communication is the consistent process by which relationships break down.
• PCT managers, in those areas, who are in local PBC leadership positions, have often joined the NHS after the policy was developed, and therefore have a restricted organisational memory.

1.2 Partnership working and the PCT’s perceived (and actual) need for clinicians to be central to commissioning remains underdeveloped in too many areas – and as that great icon of modern medicine, Sir William Osler stated, “The greater the ignorance, the greater the dogmatism” which is a cause for clinical disengagement.

1.3 Whilst many barriers and their solutions were identified at the ASE, what is central to re-invigorating PBC is to articulate its aims and objectives to the service in a coherent, cogent and consistent manner.

1.4 Where this has happened and where there is strong local leadership and commissioning capability and in particular PCT CEO support – then PBC flourishes.

1.5 As two PCT managers with whom I was discussing the provision/commissioning potential conflict debate stated at the end of the two days, “For the first time, we really understand PBC. We can now make it work”.

1.6 The draft narrative slides already produced to support the event, and beyond, may help improve understanding, but there are still some gaps, particularly in the key messages for clinicians.

1.7 As fundholding ended, the energy, expertise and clinician involvement in managing NHS resource became rapidly depleted and disengaged.
There needs to be as much a revisiting of the best elements of fundholding in understanding how this model captured the hearts, minds and imagination of clinicians and liberated the entrepreneurial spirit. This needs to also be used to re-invigorate PBC.


 
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Page 20 of 21