Media Archive 2006

PMS Press Release

 

The National Association of Primary Care, on behalf of its PMS membership, would like express its disappointment that today’s guidance on non-GMS contracting arrangements for 2006/7 was issued without prior consultation or discussion with the Association, which has vigorously supported over the years the introduction and implementation of  PMS and its variations.

NAPC strongly reaffirms its belief in the value of local contracts between practices and PCTs to support the delivery of local services tailored to meet the needs of local people.  It is right therefore that PMS contracts should be locally negotiated and agreed, and there should be a fair allocation of resource for the work that is delivered through such contracts.

Dr Johnny Marshall, Treasurer of NAPC, commented: ‘Primary care contracts, in general, are not very sophisticated in rewarding quality of care – this is as true of GMS contracts as it is of PMS contracts.  Locally negotiated contracts, however, may be more sensitive to the needs of local populations’.  Dr Marshall continued: ‘Our Association has grave concerns about those PCTs which may contemplate costly legal action rather than local negotiation in order to challenge current practice funding arrangements, particularly as we believe this latest set of guidance is driven largely by the NHS’ current deficit.  The delivery of the objectives in the recent White Paper is dependant upon stronger partnerships between practices and PCTs, and the threat of legal action will do nothing to further such relationships’.

‘Rather than seeking to constrain PMS back towards GMS’, Dr Marshall explained, ‘ we should be looking to develop PMS further and expand SPMS delivery to support the co-ordination of local patient focused health services that deliver value for money and support those in greatest need’.

The Association’s Chairman Dr James Kingsland added, ‘we must remember that PMS contracting defined the principles by which the nGMS contract was developed, so that all patients could enjoy similar benefits as those being delivered by PMS practices. Any new Directions from the DH should recognise the significant improvement in care that many PMS practices have delivered’.
The NAPC will be publishing examples of this in the near future.

Contact details for NAPC Executive Members are as follows:

Dr Johnny Marshall: 07802 946196

Dr James Kingsland: 07887 894124

Dr Howard Freeman: 0207 636 7228

Dr Derek Hopper: 07885 301763

 

 

Implementing Practice Based Commissioning

 

Online training, Coming Soon!
CPD Validated.

 

 

Practice Based Commissioning: Achieving Universal Coverage

 

Dr Kingsland commented: “Practice Based Commissioning (PBC) was the lynch pin of the whole reform of the health agenda and the main driver of NHS reforms.  It signals the reality of a primary care led NHS and the expansion of services outside of secondary care and into the community.  The guidance supports the programme for the next 12 months and encourages those PCTs and practices as yet not involved in PBC.  

PBC is the vehicle to the reform programme and expands patient care in the community and the guidance supports this further development, it should not however prevent local discussions, innovation and collaborations between practices and their PCTs.

Dr Kingsland said NAPC was the lead organisation in supporting its members’ and the wider primary care community in the delivery of Practice Based Commissioning.”

 

 

The NHS in England: The Operating Framework for 2006/07

 

The document can be downloaded via the DoH's website via the following link:

The Operating Framework for 2006/07

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 4